Sunday, July 18, 2010

8 More In Congress Sign On For Obamacare Repeal

This was published in World Net Daily.

Posted: July 17, 2010
12:45 am Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

They are U.S. Reps. Jo Ann Emerson of Missouri, Frank Wolf of Virginia, George Radanovich of California, Steve Austria of Ohio, Greg Walden of Oregon, Frank D. Lucas of Oklahoma, Adrian Smith of Nebraska and Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska, and they are the latest members of Congress to sign on to a plan to repeal Obamacare.

Its goal is to "pull out by the roots" the legislation that, among other things, will require citizens to provide their "Body Mass Index" rating to the government and purchase "government-approved" health insurance whether they want it or not.

Summer sizzle: Obamacare could be repealed before election

WND reported on the plan by U.S. Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, last week when his discharge petition had the support of 109 members of the House, exactly half the minimum it would need to advance.

There now are 133.

The proposal states: "Pursuant to clause 2 of rule XV, I, Steve King of Iowa, move to discharge the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, Education and Labor, the Judiciary, Natural Resources, Rules, House Administration and Appropriations from the consideration of the bill (H.R. 4972) to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was referred to said committees on March 25, 2010, in support of which motion the undersigned Members of the House of Representatives affix their signatures."

A good article. A good sign. Call your representatives. Ask them to come on board to repeal Obamacare. America just can't afford the astronomical price right now.

1 comment:

  1. It's sad that our government has initiated this HC Reform bill without even reading the 2000 pages all the way through. I'm sure it's loaded with 'pork' for those individuals who contributed significant amounts of money to certain campaigns.

    How did our government become so corrupt that politics became more important than the people they supposedly serve?

    ReplyDelete